Use msleep_interruptible() instead of schedule_timeout() in
send_break() to guarantee the task delays as expected. Change
@duration's units to milliseconds, and modify arguments in callers
appropriately. Patch is compile-tested.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
---


 kj-domen/drivers/char/tty_io.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/char/tty_io.c~msleep-drivers_char_tty_io drivers/char/tty_io.c
--- kj/drivers/char/tty_io.c~msleep-drivers_char_tty_io	2005-04-05 12:57:10.000000000 +0200
+++ kj-domen/drivers/char/tty_io.c	2005-04-05 12:57:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@
 #include <linux/idr.h>
 #include <linux/wait.h>
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/system.h>
@@ -2169,12 +2170,11 @@ static int tiocsetd(struct tty_struct *t
 	return tty_set_ldisc(tty, ldisc);
 }
 
-static int send_break(struct tty_struct *tty, int duration)
+static int send_break(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned int duration)
 {
 	tty->driver->break_ctl(tty, -1);
 	if (!signal_pending(current)) {
-		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-		schedule_timeout(duration);
+		msleep_interruptible(duration);
 	}
 	tty->driver->break_ctl(tty, 0);
 	if (signal_pending(current))
@@ -2355,10 +2355,10 @@ int tty_ioctl(struct inode * inode, stru
 			 * all by anyone?
 			 */
 			if (!arg)
-				return send_break(tty, HZ/4);
+				return send_break(tty, 250);
 			return 0;
 		case TCSBRKP:	/* support for POSIX tcsendbreak() */	
-			return send_break(tty, arg ? arg*(HZ/10) : HZ/4);
+			return send_break(tty, arg ? arg*100 : 250);
 
 		case TIOCMGET:
 			return tty_tiocmget(tty, file, p);
_