Any comments would be appreciated.

Description: Use msleep_interruptible() instead of
schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task delays as expected.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
---


 kj-domen/drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c~msleep_interruptible-drivers_sbus_char_envctrl drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c
--- kj/drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c~msleep_interruptible-drivers_sbus_char_envctrl	2004-12-25 01:35:03.000000000 +0100
+++ kj-domen/drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c	2004-12-25 01:35:03.000000000 +0100
@@ -1016,8 +1016,7 @@ static int kenvctrld(void *__unused)
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "envctrl: %s starting...\n", current->comm);
 	for (;;) {
-		current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-		schedule_timeout(poll_interval);
+		msleep_interruptible(jiffies_to_msecs(poll_interval));
 
 		if(signal_pending(current))
 			break;
_