Any comments would be appreciated.

Description: Use msleep_interruptible() instead of schedule_timeout() to
guarantee the task delays as expected.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
---


 kj-domen/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/parport/parport_pc.c~msleep_interruptible-drivers_parport_parport_pc drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
--- kj/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c~msleep_interruptible-drivers_parport_parport_pc	2004-12-25 01:35:02.000000000 +0100
+++ kj-domen/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c	2004-12-25 01:35:02.000000000 +0100
@@ -169,8 +169,7 @@ static int change_mode(struct parport *p
 				if (time_after_eq (jiffies, expire))
 					/* The FIFO is stuck. */
 					return -EBUSY;
-				__set_current_state (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-				schedule_timeout ((HZ + 99) / 100);
+				msleep_interruptible(10);
 				if (signal_pending (current))
 					break;
 			}
_